Counting Cats in Zanzibar Rotating Header Image

Conversation over

The comments to this entry are closed

I dare say.

I suspect that this being the ABC the comments were not quite what they anticipated.

H/T Andrew Bolt

Update:  If you are scratching your head in puzzlement, try here, here, here, and here.


One Comment

  1. Paul Marks says:

    Quite so Cats.

    It is bad enough that people demand special treatment (subsidies, quotas and so on) for being part of a racial group – but for people (Ward Churchill springs to mind) who are obviously part of that group to also demand the special treatment?

    And anyone (such as Mr Bolt) who points out it is all a FRAUD are smeared as “racists” and actually taken to be court to have their freedom of speech violated.

    To point out that someone is obviously not part of a racial group is not accusing them of a “crime” – what is a crime (a violation) is for the state to attack someone’s freedom of speech. For the state to pass “laws” that violate freedom of speech is also a crime – sorry Thomas Hobbes, the law is NOT just whatever the state wants it to be.

    And now the (tax funded) ABC organization is continuing the persecution of Andrew Bolt.

    No wonder they do not want any more comments.

    But if they do not want any any more comments they should stop stealing money from tax payers to fund their wages.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: