…and another for them.
A muslim who raped a 13-year-old girl he groomed on Facebook has been spared a prison sentence after a judge heard he went to an Islamic faith school where he was taught that women are worthless.
I don’t recall that being included in the national curriculum.
Adil Rashid, 18, claimed he was not aware that it was illegal for him to have sex with the girl because his education left him ignorant of British law.
Where’s he been living? Under a rock? In some dark cave? Has he never watched TV or read a newspaper?
Yesterday Judge Michael Stokes handed Rashid a suspended sentence, saying: ‘Although chronologically 18, it is quite clear from the reports that you are very naive and immature when it comes to sexual matters.’
As mitigating circumstances go this one is thinner than a stick insect’s todger. Worked like a charm though, didn’t it.
Earlier Nottingham Crown Court heard that such crimes usually result in a four to seven-year prison sentence.
Used to result in a four to seven-year prison sentence. The precedent this moron of a judge has just set into law has handed paedos of a particular hue a get out of jail free card. What the Scammel happened to ignorance is no defence? What happened to justice? I’ll tell you what’s happened to it. Our wonderful judiciary just cut off the blind old biddy’s head with that sword of hers and shoved the scales down the hole in her neck!
But the judge said that because Rashid was ‘passive’ and ‘lacking assertiveness’, sending him to jail might cause him ‘more damage than good’.
I guess Rashid dressing up to look like a schoolboy and standing in the dock clasping his hands in front and staring contritely at his feet did the trick, eh?
Rashid, from Birmingham, admitted he had sex with the girl, saying he had been ‘tempted by her’ after they met online.
It was all the girl’s fault. She wasn’t done up in a tent like a human letterbox so Rashid didn’t have a choice.
Gimme a frigging break! This is Britain we’re talking about, not some medieval shithole. We don’t have Sharia courts here.
They initially exchanged messages on Facebook before sending texts and chatting on the phone over a two-month period.
They then met up in Nottingham, where Rashid had booked a room at a Premier Inn.
Yeah, he was so naive, passive and lacking assertiveness he had the forethought to pre-book a room in the hotel.
The girl told police they stayed at the hotel for two hours and had sex after Rashid went to the bathroom and emerged wearing a condom.
Wait. What the…?
Let’s perform a little re-wind.
…you are very naive and immature when it comes to sexual matters.
Not so naive and immature he didn’t know about condoms and what they are for. Clearly not much of a lily-white ingénue then. Yet the judge chose to ignore that this paragon of Islamic values went equipped.
I’d say the only naive and immature tosser in the courtroom was Judge Stokes because he’s been had over good and proper.
Rashid then returned home and went straight to a mosque to pray.
Because praying to a Dark Ages warlord who had a nine year old bride is what you do after having sex with a child in a country that locks up paedophiles. Or at least used to.
He was arrested the following week after the girl confessed what had happened to a school friend, who informed one of her teachers.
It’s a pity the silly girl didn’t confide to her very sensible friend before she met Rashid in the flesh, so to speak.
He told police he knew the girl was 13 but said he was initially reluctant to have sex before relenting after being seduced.
The accused was so reluctant he went to the expense of booking a room and nipping into a chemist for a pack of three. I say chemist since I’m assuming that procuring johnnies from a dispenser in the hotel lavvy is haram. Or he could have got them from a third party of course.
Earlier the court heard how Rashid had ‘little experience of women’ due to his education at an Islamic school in the UK, which cannot be named for legal reasons.
The name of a school that labels a seven year old a racist for asking another child an innocent question about his skin colour gets splashed all over the papers. So how come the name of the “school” that teaches its male pupils that women are scum and can be treated as scum gets a pass? Surely this poison should be weeded out, not protected?
After his arrest, he told a psychologist that he did not know having sex with a 13-year-old was against the law. The court heard he found it was illegal only when he was informed by a family member.
At which point he was so full of remorse for breaking the law he gave himself up to the police. Oh, wait. No he didn’t.
In other interviews with psychologists, Rashid claimed he had been taught in his school that ‘women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground’.
I’d just love to see the last Ofstead report on this school. I wonder if it was a glowing, politically correct one? I can’t wait to see Ofstead explain how rampant Islamic misogyny passed under their radar, accepting, like the judge did, that Rashid isn’t a lying little scrote. I take it that these Islamic schools are inspected like other faith schools are. If what Rashid said is true, how many more madrassas in the UK wipe their arses with the national curriculum while under Ofstead’s purview?
When Judge Stokes said Rashid ‘must have known it was illegal, unless he was going round with his eyes shut’, defence lawyer Laban Leake said reports suggested Rashid had a ‘degree of sexual naivety’.
Clearly, Rashid wasn’t the only one going round with his eyes shut…
The school he attended, it is not going too far to say, can be described as a closed community and on this occasion this was perpetuated by his home life.
No shit, Sherlock! Are we going to see the same largesse handed out to a boy, formerly cloistered in a Catholic school, grooming thirteen year olds and having sex with them?
Then why has Rashid been allowed to get away with it?
‘It is not too far to say that he may not have known that having sex with a 13-year-old girl was illegal.’ Judge Stokes sentenced Rashid to nine months youth custody, suspended for two years, along with a two-year probation supervision order.
But apparently it’s too far to say that Rashid had a mobile phone and a Facebook account which means he had access to the internet. With all the news about Muslim child grooming gangs and teachers running off abroad with underage pupils being splashed around the media and internet how can he not have known?
Describing Rashid, the judge said: ‘He’s had an unusual education, certainly in terms of the sexual education provided. Comparing women to lollipops is a very curious way of teaching young men about sex.’
Bangs head on table. It’s not “curious” shit-for-brains, it’s scammelling scandalous! All those frigging gender equality laws the legal profession print money from vigorously support are being trodden into the mud and all Stokes can say is that it’s curious? Is he high on crack cocaine or something? Is he so blinded by political correctness that he can’t see where this will lead?
But he said that Rashid knew what he was doing was wrong.
Then why isn’t Rashid busy avoiding dropping the soap in a prison bathroom? He groomed and had sex with an underage girl. That is a prisonable offence.
‘It was made clear to you at the school you attended that having sexual relations with a woman before marriage was contrary to the precepts of Islam,’ he said.
So Rashid is being given this outrageously lenient sentenced for ignoring madrassa teaching?
Addressing Rashid, the judge said: ‘I accept this was a case where the girl was quite willing to have sexual activity with you. But the law is there to protect young girls, even though they are perfectly happy to engage in sexual activity.’
Unless some dhimmified Judge is willing to make an exception when it suits him?
The law my left buttock! British law has become a travesty, a joke, a sham. It is unfit for purpose. Judge Stokes should hang up his wig and gown in shame. Letting a paedophile go because he went to the wrong school is an unacceptable defence. and the sentence handed down has no place in any civilised society.