Counting Cats in Zanzibar Rotating Header Image

Lying in the Age of Obama

Victor Davis Hanson, for those who have the misfortune to be located in the Provinces *g*, is a military and classical historian who is a highly-regarded columnist on current affairs here in the States.

Below are the major headings from his piece on the current vogue for and acceptability of lying as a way of life, with a sentence or two from the start of each. There are many more links throughout the piece, at the source:

http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/lying-in-the-age-of-obama/?singlepage=true

Victor Davis Hanson:

Lying in the Age of Obama

July 23rd, 2013 – 12:02 am

A Nation of Liars

The attorney general of the United States lied recently to Congress. He said he knew of no citizen’s communications that his department had monitored. Lie!

But why pick on the president?

The media routinely peddles “noble” untruths. ABC manipulated a video to show George Zimmerman without much injury to his head.

It’s Not Really the Cover-up

Our current scandals are predicated on lies. No one believed the official White House version that the IRS miscreants were rogue agents from a Cincinnati field office.

Is There Anyone Left Who Doesn’t Lie?

Why do they lie? Because they can. Or to paraphrase Dirty Harry, they like it.

The Cover-up Pays

We repeat the nauseous canard that “it is not the crime, but the cover-up” that gets you in trouble in Washington. But that too is often a lie….

Why Do Our Best and Brightest Lie?

There are both age-old and more recent catalysts for lying.

One, lying and plagiarism are forms of narcissism.

So Why Not Lie?

I end with three reasons to tell the truth.

“We always lose,” says Chris at the end of the The Magnificent Seven after he did the right thing. Or to paraphrase the cinematic T.E. Lawrence about Auda Abu Tayi, we will not lie, as do our elites, because it is simply “our pleasure” not to.

3 Comments

  1. Daphne says:

    Hack conservative writer VDH did a stunningly poor job of plagiarizing John Derbryshire’s controversial piece at the National Review, which ultimately lost John his job at same said neocon publication.

    Hanson is a war mongering, uber neo-con, Jennifer Rubin clit-sucking, GWB cheerleading piece of shit and I’m surprised any quasi-libertarian would extoll this idiot’s imbecilic body of work.

    Derbyshire’s staunch paleo-conservatism has several worthy merits for those who still bother to think for themselves. Victor Davis Hanson appeals to low information Rush Limbaugh voters and brain dead ideologues who actually believe the Tea Party is a grass roots political movement.

    Please don’t tell me you’re a fan of Rubio, Cruz or the defunct Mr. West.

  2. Julie near Chicago says:

    This is great stuff! I think it’s a fine example of what is often called “the argument from intimidation.” :>)

  3. Andrew says:

    Maybe if you put your head deep enough in the sand and keep mentally chanting “The right are evil, baby-eating bastards” it’s possible to ignore what utter slime the messiah and his merry men are.

    Or maybe it’d just drive you crazy, as demonstrated by Daphne.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: